Here's an interesting statistic from the U.S. Department of Commerce and Forbes magazine as reported by Holly Sklar:
The 400 richest American families in 2006 had as much wealth as the entire bottom half of the nation.
In other words, those 400 families had as much wealth as 57 million American households. That is 400 compared to 57,000,000! Wow! That is the inequality and great economic disparity issues I wrote about a couple of days ago but hadn't realized the numbers or the magnitude of the difference.
I have a Christian acquaintance whose husband was a university professor and apostle of Milt Friedman, the laissez-faire against government regulations economist. I'll call my church friend "Jill." Anyway, we've been in the same ladies' study group at church for many years. Jill reflects her husband's views and opposes and vehemently argues against universal healthcare saying she doesn't want and shouldn't have to pay for anybody else's health insurance, and besides everyone already has access to healthcare via hospital emergency rooms. This stunned me, and I pointed out that we all indirectly DO pay for those using the more costly emergency room instead of a family physician when they become ill. We pay with higher hospital and insurance rates.
After Hurricane Katrina, Jill voiced her opinion that the people themselves were responsible for their misery because they should have left New Orleans before their homes were flooded. I told her many were so very poor they had no transportation available ..... but she wasn't swayed and went on to point out how destructive those people behaved with their looting of businesses, etc.
In spite of our really huge political differences, we remain civil and even friendly. Jill is truly a very nice lady. She volunteers at church and regularly donates her time reading to the elderly in a retirement village's nursing home.....albeit one caring for rather affluent residents. I suppose that sounds a little catty, but it is true....no charity patients there.
After Hurricane Katrina, Bill O'Reilly said all kids should be made to watch videos of what happened to the poor people in New Orleans because they couldn't get out of town, and their teachers should then tell them: "If you refuse to learn, if you refuse to work hard, if you become addicted, if you live a gangsta life, you will be poor and powerless just like those in New Orleans."
Anyway, my point is that there are a lot of conservatives who share the same philosophy expressed by O'Reilly and other ultra conservative pundits like WLW Cincinnati radio talk show host and frequent Fox News guest Bill Cunningham who said: "The reason people are poor in America is not because they lack money, it's because poor people in America lack values, character, and the ability to work hard."
These are the conservatives who believe in Social Darwinism which reasons that poor people deserve to be poor because they are lazy and/or stupid and lack moral values; and wealthy people are rich because they have just the opposite qualities and so deserve to be rich.
I don't know about Jill, but I imagine some Christian conservatives might feel uncomfortable and have to do a lot of rationalization and selective Bible verse reading when their Christian beliefs collide head on with their beliefs in Social Darwinism combined with the "Trickle Down" political economic policy philosophy. [Say that 10 times fast!] The late well known economist, John Kenneth Galbraith, said it very well indeed:
"The modern conervative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishnes."
[The quoted material and statistics are from Jack Clark's "Blast the Right" website and podcast #158]
Recent Comments